I can't think of any features in FF 22 that I particularly needed that I wasn't getting in FF 21. Unnecessary updates demonstrably often cause more harm than good. Security is a separate issue and should be kept separate. Simple answer.Security patches should be issued separately to avoid the developing vibe where people just refuse to upgrade because of all the problems and few benefits. There's also a lot of stuff in these version updates that has zip to do with security. It is possible to issue a security patch without an entire update. Realistically, security patches might, but don't always or even usually, have to require entire version updates that routinely break add-ons in the program. The bogeyman of security to compel updating is often grossly exaggerated for several reasons. Well, it's always solved my problem, but let's ignore that part for the moment. That usually doesn't solve the problem and will make your computer and information vulnerable to attack." When I see a FF boilerplate comment like this, I react with skepticism: "Often when there is a problem with a Firefox update, people look for a way to go back to the previous version. Worse still, I can't figure out what is going to break until I install the program.if I could get an advance report, I just wouldn't install the upgrade. It is hard for developers to keep up given this update program that was adopted a couple of years ago. I saw in another thread a debate over whose fault this was, FF or Real, but realistically, as discussed before, the lightning fast speed of version updates from Mozilla breaks lots of extensions all the time and makes upgrading a peril every time. The download button simply does not appear. I've made sure all the add-ons and plugins it creates are enabled. I have reinstalled the latest version of Real Player twice.
0 kommentar(er)
